Dermatica / Anti-Ageing Treatment
PERSONALISED FORMULA
The first personalised prescription formula in this register to print its concentrations on the page you buy from — tretinoin 0.025–0.1%, hydroquinone 4%, niacinamide 4%. The same page contains no side effects, no contra-indications and no pregnancy warning. The $39.99 cosmetic two clicks away has all three.
Worth buying for a specific person with a specific problem. Read who.
ASSESSED ON 75% OF THE MODEL. 2 CRITERIA LEFT UNSCORED — SEE SCORING FOR WHY.
If you are pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive, say so in the consultation — this page will not ask you, and the company does run a pregnancy-safe formula.
The verdict
This is the disclosure we have been asking four brands for, and it arrives on the page where the decision happens. Tretinoin 0.025–0.1%. Hydroquinone 4%. Niacinamide 4%. Azelaic acid 4–20%. Real numbers, printed under the actives, on the treatment page — not in a help-centre article, not on a third-party listing, not withheld as 'personalised'. A separate index publishes the whole prescription palette with strengths attached, and the ingredient pages carry named academic citations with journal, authors, year and page numbers. No other company in this register does any of that.
The formula those numbers describe is right. Tretinoin's published range is exactly the therapeutic band the photoageing trials use, floor and ceiling both. Niacinamide at 4% is a working dose and the correct partner for a retinoid. Hydroquinone is at 4% — the conventional prescription strength, and a third of what we found in a competitor's body cream. Two or three actives per formula, in a base built around ceramides and panthenol. There is nothing here that is decorative.
Then you read the rest of the page and there is no rest of the page. We counted: zero occurrences of 'side effect'. Zero contra-indications. Zero mentions of sunscreen, on a page selling a drug that increases photosensitivity. Zero mentions of pregnancy, on a page selling topical tretinoin to adults of reproductive age. The one word 'pregnant' in the source belongs to an advert for a different product.
And the company knows how to write all of it. Its $39.99 retinal serum — a cosmetic — has a dedicated pregnancy FAQ, a bolded refusal, an explanation of the evidence gap, and two pregnancy-safe alternatives by name. That page even mentions that a pregnancy-safe personalised formula exists. So the warning is written, the protocol is written, the safer product is built, and none of it is on the page where you start the consultation. This is a very good company keeping its safety copy in the wrong building.
- Concentrations are printed on the treatment page itself — the first personalised prescription brand in this register to do it.
- Tretinoin's published range, 0.025%–0.1%, is exactly the therapeutic band, floor and ceiling.
- Hydroquinone at 4% is the conventional prescription strength, published as a single number.
- A separate ingredients index publishes the entire prescription palette with strengths, including benzoyl peroxide 2.5%, clindamycin 1%, metronidazole 0.75%, tranexamic acid 3–5% and fluocinolone 0.01%.
- The ingredient pages carry named academic citations — journal, authors, year, volume, pages. Nothing else in this register cites its sources.
- Full INCI and fill size published for every cosmetic in the range.
- Pricing is published per bottle across four plan lengths, and the stated 15/20/25% savings are arithmetically correct.
- Retinisation guidance is genuinely good: build up on alternate nights, or apply moisturiser first, or wash off after 60 minutes and extend.
- A named consultant dermatologist is attached to the clinical statements.
- The purchase page states no side effects, no contra-indications, no pregnancy warning and no sunscreen instruction.
- The $39.99 cosmetic retinal serum carries a full pregnancy warning and pregnancy-safe alternatives. The prescription retinoid page carries none.
- Hydroquinone 4% is sold on a rolling subscription with a twelve-month prepay, against the company's own stated three-to-four-month cycle.
- Hydroquinone is the only prescription active with no ingredient page; /ingredients/hydroquinone returns a 404.
- No fill size for the prescription formula, so cost per application is not computable.
- 'SmartBase' is described, not disclosed — no INCI for the product you apply nightly.
- 'Up to 20x stronger than the high street' names no comparator on the page; the anchor appears only in the company's social advertising.
- 'FDA REGULATED' sits in a trust-badge strip between 'CRUELTY FREE' and '100% VEGAN'. Compounded formulas are not FDA-approved.
- The tretinoin FAQ tells patients not to use benzoyl peroxide alongside it, while the company's own palette contains benzoyl peroxide 2.5%.
Every active, assessed
- Tretinoin0.025%–0.1%
Retinoid — binds nuclear RAR, upregulates procollagen, normalises keratinisation
- BENCHMARK
- 0.025%–0.1% is the trial range for photoageing
- ASSESSMENT
- Published as a range on the page you buy from, and the range is precisely the therapeutic band — the floor is a real dose and the ceiling is the top of it. The best-evidenced topical in dermatology for this indication, dosed correctly and stated openly. The page does not name which point you will start at; the answer, per their own FAQ, is low with gradual increase, which is right.
- Hydroquinone4%
Tyrosinase inhibitor — blocks melanin synthesis
- BENCHMARK
- 4% is the conventional prescription strength
- ASSESSMENT
- The correct number, and the only single hydroquinone concentration published on any product page in this register. The concern is not the dose, it is the clock. Hydroquinone is a course. Dermatica's own blog says three to four months then a break; its own support centre says six. Neither figure appears on this page, and the checkout sells twelve months upfront.
- Niacinamide4%
Barrier support, anti-inflammatory, pigment transfer inhibition
- BENCHMARK
- 2%–5% is the evidenced range
- ASSESSMENT
- A real working dose, published, and the right thing to put beside a retinoid — it damps the irritation that determines whether anyone is still applying this at month six.
- Azelaic Acid4%–20%
Antioxidant, normalises keratinisation, fades post-inflammatory pigment
- BENCHMARK
- 15%–20% is the standalone treatment range
- ASSESSMENT
- The top of the published range is full treatment strength and the bottom is not — 4% azelaic acid is a supporting player. A five-fold published range is honest about the fact that personalisation is happening, and wide enough that two people told they are 'on azelaic acid' are on materially different products. Worth asking which end you got.
| ACTIVE | CONC. | BENCHMARK | ASSESSMENT |
|---|---|---|---|
| TretinoinRetinoid — binds nuclear RAR, upregulates procollagen, normalises keratinisation | 0.025%–0.1% | 0.025%–0.1% is the trial range for photoageing | Published as a range on the page you buy from, and the range is precisely the therapeutic band — the floor is a real dose and the ceiling is the top of it. The best-evidenced topical in dermatology for this indication, dosed correctly and stated openly. The page does not name which point you will start at; the answer, per their own FAQ, is low with gradual increase, which is right. |
| HydroquinoneTyrosinase inhibitor — blocks melanin synthesis | 4% | 4% is the conventional prescription strength | The correct number, and the only single hydroquinone concentration published on any product page in this register. The concern is not the dose, it is the clock. Hydroquinone is a course. Dermatica's own blog says three to four months then a break; its own support centre says six. Neither figure appears on this page, and the checkout sells twelve months upfront. |
| NiacinamideBarrier support, anti-inflammatory, pigment transfer inhibition | 4% | 2%–5% is the evidenced range | A real working dose, published, and the right thing to put beside a retinoid — it damps the irritation that determines whether anyone is still applying this at month six. |
| Azelaic AcidAntioxidant, normalises keratinisation, fades post-inflammatory pigment | 4%–20% | 15%–20% is the standalone treatment range | The top of the published range is full treatment strength and the bottom is not — 4% azelaic acid is a supporting player. A five-fold published range is honest about the fact that personalisation is happening, and wide enough that two people told they are 'on azelaic acid' are on materially different products. Worth asking which end you got. |
Scoring
- EVIDENCE FOR THE ACTIVEWEIGHT 30%84/100
Tretinoin across the full 0.025%–0.1% trial range, niacinamide at 4%, hydroquinone at the conventional 4%, azelaic acid reaching standalone strength. Every active is real, evidenced and correctly bounded, and the ingredient pages cite the literature by name. Held back because the photoageing citations offered are narrative reviews rather than the primary trials, because there is no clinical data for the personalised formula itself, and because hydroquinone in an open-ended anti-ageing formula is an indication stretch.
- FORMULATION INTEGRITYWEIGHT 20%68/100
Two to three actives per formula rather than a kitchen sink, in a base described as hyaluronic acid, ceramides, glycerin and panthenol, stated fragrance-free and alcohol-free. Marked down because 'SmartBase' is a description rather than an ingredient list — every cosmetic on this site publishes full INCI and the prescription product publishes none — and because the tretinoin FAQ warns against combining with benzoyl peroxide, which is in the company's own palette at 2.5%.
- DISCLOSUREWEIGHT 15%54/100
Split down the middle, and the two halves are the best and the worst we have recorded. Composition: concentrations on the purchase page, a full palette index with strengths, named journal citations, honest per-unit pricing across four plan lengths. Risk: no side effects, no contra-indications, no pregnancy warning, no sunscreen instruction, no fill size, no page at all for hydroquinone, and an 'FDA REGULATED' badge on a compounded drug.
- TOLERANCE IN USEWEIGHT 15%NOT ASSESSED
Not assessed. For a tretinoin product this is the criterion that decides everything, because tolerance is what determines whether anyone is still using it at month six. Their retinisation guidance is unusually good — it is simply on a different page.
- TEXTURE & WEARWEIGHT 10%NOT ASSESSED
Not assessed. Requires the product in hand across the full retinisation window.
- COST PER APPLICATIONWEIGHT 10%62/100
$29.95 a month including prescriber, adjustments and shipping is fair, and the published ladder down to $22.42 a bottle on the twelve-month plan is the cheapest per-unit prescription pricing in this register. Held back because no fill size is published anywhere, so cost per application still cannot be computed — and because the cheapest tier is the one that runs past the company's own hydroquinone stop.
What it is
A compounded prescription night cream for photoageing, prescribed after an online consultation, at $29.95 a month following a $4.99 first month. A provider selects two or three actives from a published palette and blends them into a base the company calls SmartBase. Two bottles ship every 56 days, and the plan runs until you stop it.
The concentrations are on the page. That has not happened before.
Eighteen reviews into this register, the sentence we have written most often is that the concentration is not on the page you buy from. Musely keeps its numbers in a help centre. Agency and Curology decline to give them at all, on the grounds that the formula is personalised. CoreAge Rx publishes some and not others.
Dermatica prints them under the actives, on the treatment page, before you have paid anything.
- Tretinoin 0.025–0.1% — stated as a range, and the range is exactly the photoageing trial band.
- Hydroquinone 4% — a single number, and the conventional prescription strength.
- Niacinamide 4% — a working dose, not a token one.
- Azelaic acid 4–20% — a wide range, honestly wide, reaching standalone treatment strength at the top.
A separate ingredients index goes further and publishes the whole prescription palette with strengths attached: adapalene 0.1–0.3%, benzoyl peroxide 2.5%, clindamycin 1%, fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, metronidazole 0.75%, tranexamic acid 3–5%. That is the document every other brand in this register told us could not exist because the formulas are personalised. It exists. It took one click.
The tretinoin ingredient page ends with eight references — journal, authors, year, volume, pages. Darlenski in the British Journal of Dermatology, the Cochrane melasma review, the AAD acne guidelines. This site exists because nobody in the category does that, and here is somebody doing it. The fair caveat: the photoageing entries are narrative reviews rather than the primary trials, and four of the eight are acne studies rather than ageing ones. It is still the only bibliography in the register.
And then the page stops talking
We searched the page source. Not the visible copy — the source, including everything the page loads and does not show.
- 'side effect' — zero occurrences.
- 'contraindication' — zero occurrences.
- 'ochronosis' — zero occurrences, on a page selling hydroquinone.
- 'sunscreen' — zero in the visible copy, on a page selling a photosensitising drug.
- 'pregnant' — one occurrence in the entire source, and it belongs to a product card advertising something else.
This is a page that will take a $4.99 payment, open a medical consultation and put topical tretinoin and 4% hydroquinone on your face every night, and it does not tell you that retinoids peel, that they contraindicate pregnancy, or that you need to wear sunscreen with them.
Five items counted on each page as published, 27 July 2026: active concentration, fill size, full ingredient list, stated side effects, pregnancy warning. The prescription drug is the least documented thing Dermatica sells, and the cheapest cosmetic is the best documented.
The retinal serum page carries a dedicated FAQ — 'Can I use this if I'm pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive?' — answered with a bolded 'our dermatology team does not recommend this product', an explanation that the evidence is insufficient, and two pregnancy-safe alternatives by name. It also notes, in passing, that a pregnancy-safe personalised formula exists. Every word of that is correct and well written. It is attached to a $39.99 cosmetic. The prescription retinoid page has none of it.
This matters more than a missing paragraph usually would, because the copy is not absent from the company — it is absent from the page. The tretinoin ingredient page states it plainly: tretinoin should not be used in pregnancy, when planning pregnancy, or while breastfeeding, with effective contraception advised during treatment and for a month after. That is the correct warning, correctly worded, two clicks from the consultation and zero clicks from nothing.
We made this finding against Musely for keeping concentrations in a help centre. Dermatica has inverted it exactly: the composition is on the page and the safety is filed elsewhere. Of the two arrangements, this is the more serious one. A buyer who cannot find a concentration buys a product they do not fully understand. A buyer who cannot find a pregnancy warning may not know to look for one.
Hydroquinone 4%, and a plan that outruns the stop
Credit where it is substantial: 4% is the right number. This register has recorded hydroquinone at 12% in a body cream, 12% in a genital cream and 12% in a peel, and at no stated concentration at all in two other products. Dermatica publishes one figure and it is the conventional prescription strength.
CoreAge Rx's Spot On and Agency's Dark Spot Formula also contain hydroquinone and publish no concentration, so neither can appear on this chart. Dermatica is the only brand here that names a single hydroquinone number on the product page — and names the right one.
The problem is duration, and Dermatica has already written the answer down twice. Its own SkinLab article says a provider 'should only recommend using hydroquinone for short periods, typically in cycles of three to four months, followed by a break'. Its support centre says the dermatology team believe a break is needed after six months, because side-effect risk rises. Both are sound. Neither is on the treatment page.
The pricing page, meanwhile, sells four plans: pay monthly at $29.95, or prepay four months at $25.25 a bottle, six at $23.83, or twelve at $22.42 — $269 upfront, and the largest discount attached to the longest commitment. The savings arithmetic is honest, which is more than most. But the cheapest option on the page is twelve months of continuous supply of a formula that may contain a drug the same company says to stop after three to four.
A Dermatica plan is a subscription to a prescribing relationship, not to a fixed formula — the provider reviews and can swap actives at any check-in, and the formula does change over time. So a twelve-month plan does not necessarily mean twelve months of hydroquinone. It means twelve months paid, with the stop dependent on a review happening and someone acting on it. Musely, whose hydroquinone dosing we criticised far more heavily, cycles the drug off automatically and ships the replacement bottle unasked. That is the better mechanism, and it belongs here.
The ingredient with the most to explain is the only one without a page
Dermatica publishes full ingredient pages for adapalene, benzoyl peroxide and tretinoin — each with targets, strengths, mechanisms, an FAQ and a bibliography. The tretinoin page is the best piece of consumer drug writing in this register.
Hydroquinone gets a line in the navigation under 'Other ingredients', a one-sentence description in the index, and no page. We checked the obvious URL; /ingredients/hydroquinone returns a 404.
So the ingredient with the exogenous ochronosis literature, the mandatory treatment break, the rebound-pigmentation risk on abrupt withdrawal, and the FDA action that removed it from over-the-counter sale in the United States — the one active in the palette that genuinely needs a page — is the one active in the palette without one. The three that have pages are the three that need them least.
Twenty times stronger than what?
'Up to 20x stronger than the high street' appears in the What's included list, beside 'Evidence-based ingredients' and 'Dashboard to track your progress'. The page never says what the comparator is.
The company's own social advertising completes the sentence: 'up to 20x stronger than generic retinol'. With that anchor the claim is arguable — retinol needs two oxidation steps to become retinoic acid and the conversion is inefficient, so potency estimates in the region of ten to twenty times are commonly cited. Without the anchor, sitting on the page as written, it reads as twenty times stronger than anything you could buy in a shop, which is not a statement about anything measurable.
It is a small thing on an otherwise numerate page, and it is the same habit as the retinal serum's '11x faster than retinol' — a round multiplier presented without its denominator. A company this willing to publish real figures does not need them.
'FDA REGULATED', between 'CRUELTY FREE' and '100% VEGAN'
A scrolling badge strip runs across the treatment page: alcohol free, fragrance free, 100% vegan, cruelty free, easily recyclable packaging, formulated by experts, science backed, developed with dermatologists, FDA regulated.
Eight of those are cosmetic marketing attributes. The ninth is a regulatory status, and in that company it will be read as a quality mark meaning approved. Compounded preparations are not FDA-approved: they are made for an individual patient under section 503A and are expressly exempt from premarket review. A 503A pharmacy is subject to FDA oversight, so the two words are defensible in isolation. Placed ninth in a list that begins with vegan and cruelty-free, they are doing different work.
One contradiction they should fix in an afternoon
The tretinoin FAQ tells patients that keratolytic agents — sulphur, salicylic acid, benzoyl peroxide, resorcinol — 'should not be used whilst you are using tretinoin'. That warning is inherited from decades-old tretinoin labelling, written when benzoyl peroxide was thought to oxidise tretinoin in situ. Modern stabilised formulations have largely settled it, and fixed-combination benzoyl peroxide and tretinoin products are now FDA-approved.
It also contradicts Dermatica's own catalogue, which lists benzoyl peroxide 2.5% in the same prescription palette as tretinoin. Either the combination is dispensable or the FAQ is right, and both documents are on the same website.
If you are considering it
- Read the tretinoin ingredient page before the treatment page. It is where the side effects, the pregnancy warning, the sunscreen instruction and the retinisation protocol actually live, and all four are good.
- If you are pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive, say so unprompted. The consultation page will not raise it, and the pregnancy-safe formula exists.
- Ask which two or three actives you have been given and at what point in each published range. 'Azelaic acid' spans 4% to 20% here.
- If hydroquinone is one of them, put the stop date in your calendar yourself — three to four months by their blog, six by their support centre. Do not rely on the subscription to raise it.
- For that reason, think hard before prepaying twelve months. The discount is real and so is the drug's clock.
- Buy sunscreen. Nothing on the purchase page will tell you to, and a retinoid without it is working against itself.
- Give it twelve to twenty-four weeks. The page's twelve-week figure is honest by the standards of this category.
Where we stand
At 71 this is the highest score any provider-selects-your-actives formula has earned here, ahead of Agency's best at 65 and Curology's at 59, and it earned it on exactly the axis this site was built to measure. Dermatica publishes the numbers. It publishes the palette. It cites the literature. It prices per unit and the arithmetic checks out. Everything we have spent eighteen reviews asking for, one company has simply done.
It is not higher because the same page that tells you the concentration of the drug tells you nothing about the risk of it. No side effects, no contra-indications, no pregnancy warning, no sunscreen — while the cheap cosmetic upsell three inches below carries all four. That is not a company that does not know; the evidence that it knows is on its own website in better prose than most dermatology practices manage.
Move the tretinoin FAQ's safety block onto the treatment page. Give hydroquinone the ingredient page the other three actives already have, with the break written into it. Publish the SmartBase INCI and the fill size. Stop selling twelve months of a drug you say to stop at four. None of that is a reformulation — it is copy that already exists, filed in the wrong place. Do it and this becomes the first prescription product in this register we recommend without conditions.
Who this is for
- Someone over thirty who wants prescription tretinoin at a correct dose and wants to know the number before paying.
- Someone stepping up from an over-the-counter retinol who will start at the bottom of the range and titrate.
- Someone with photoageing plus genuine pigmentation who will treat hydroquinone as a course and diarise the stop themselves.
- Someone who will wear broad-spectrum sunscreen daily without being told to, because this page will not tell them.
- Someone who will give it twelve to twenty-four weeks and read the ingredient pages before the treatment page.
- You are pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive. Tretinoin is contraindicated — ask for the pregnancy-safe formula instead, which they do run.
- You want to prepay twelve months and not think about it. The hydroquinone in this formula is not a twelve-month drug.
- You are already using another retinoid, prescription or otherwise. Do not stack them.
- You need the full ingredient list of what you are putting on your face nightly — it is not published for the prescription formula.
- You have active eczema, rosacea or a compromised barrier. Settle that first.
If you are pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive, say so in the consultation — this page will not ask you, and the company does run a pregnancy-safe formula.
This is an editorial assessment of published information about a prescription product. It is not a diagnosis, not a prescription and not a substitute for your own prescriber. Hydroquinone and tretinoin are drugs. Decisions about them belong with a clinician who has seen your skin.
Sources
- S-01Dermatica — anti-ageing treatment page Published concentrations, $4.99/$29.95 pricing, 56-day cadence, the 12-week and '20x stronger' claims, the SmartBase description, the badge strip, and the absence of side effects, contra-indications, sunscreen and pregnancy content. Read 27 July 2026.
- S-02Dermatica — ingredients index The full prescription palette with strengths: adapalene 0.1–0.3%, azelaic acid 4–20%, benzoyl peroxide 2.5%, clindamycin 1%, fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, hydroquinone 4%, metronidazole 0.75%, niacinamide 4%, tranexamic acid 3–5%, tretinoin 0.025–0.1%. Note that hydroquinone has no page of its own; /ingredients/hydroquinone returns 404.
- S-03Dermatica — tretinoin ingredient page The eight named journal citations, the pregnancy and contraception warning, the side-effect list, the sunscreen instruction, the retinisation protocol, and the keratolytic/benzoyl peroxide interaction warning.
- S-04Dermatica — pricing page The four payment plans and their per-bottle prices: $29.95 monthly, $25.25 over four months, $23.83 over six, $22.42 over twelve at $269 upfront.
- S-05Dermatica — Retinal 0.05%–0.2% Serum The cosmetic comparison: full INCI, 30ml fill, the bolded pregnancy refusal with named pregnancy-safe alternatives, the reference to a pregnancy-safe personalised formula, and the disclosed user trial of 54 respondents aged 25–60.
- S-06Dermatica — Clarifying Azelaic Acid 15–20% Cream Full INCI, 1 fl.oz fill and a pregnancy FAQ on a $24.95 cosmetic — the second half of the disclosure comparison in Fig. 1.
- S-07Dermatica SkinLab — hydroquinone cream The company's own published position: hydroquinone should be used 'for short periods, typically in cycles of three to four months, followed by a break', and its ochronosis risk.
- S-08Dermatica support centre — hydroquinone The dermatology team's stated position that a break is needed after six months of hydroquinone because side-effect risk increases. In the support centre, not on the treatment page.
- S-09FDA — protecting consumers from potentially harmful OTC skin lightening products The US regulatory position that removed hydroquinone from over-the-counter sale, which is why the prescription gate on this product is the correct side of the line.
- S-10Ishack et al. — Exogenous ochronosis associated with hydroquinone: a systematic review (Int J Dermatol, 2022) The ochronosis literature underlying the finding that hydroquinone is a course rather than a subscription.